Peddling Panic,Why Media Sells Doom While Realists Seize Opportunity

How FUD-Factory Narratives Clash with Economic Hope

---

The U.S. economy is outperforming expectations. Inflation is cooling, unemployment remains near historic lows, and consumer spending holds steady. Yet, many Americans feel like disaster looms. Why? Left-leaning mainstream media (MSM) relentlessly pushes fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD), amplifying economic dread under President Trump while staying eerily quiet during more challenging times under Biden.

But not everyone’s buying the gloom. Skeptics of MSM narratives—from Main Street investors to everyday citizens—see opportunity, creating two simultaneous realities: one of manufactured panic and another of cautious excitement.

The Numbers Paint a Solid Picture

The data signals resilience. March 2025 Consumer Price Index (CPI) figures show inflation easing to 2.4% from 2.8%, thanks to cheaper energy and travel costs. Unemployment sits below 4%, near full employment. GDP growth is stable, and stock markets are creeping upward. Bond yields have risen slightly amid geopolitical tensions and trade policy shifts, but the economy appears to be on track for a soft landing, not a crash.

So why does it feel like chaos for so many?

Headlines That Pick Their Moments

Left-leaning outlets churn out grim narratives:

• “Americans Still Feel the Squeeze”

• “The Economy Works—But Not for Everyone”

• “Inflation Fears Hit 1981 Levels”

These headlines don’t lie outright, but they cherry-pick pain over progress. Cooling inflation? Drowned out by consumer complaints. Stable growth? Buried under collapse warnings.

This framing jars with the Biden era, when MSM downplayed far worse. From 2021 to 2024, inflation hit 9.1% at its peak, energy prices soared, interest rates spiked, and global conflicts—like Russia’s war in Ukraine and Middle East tensions—loomed large. Yet, headlines often called these "transitory" or stayed cautiously upbeat, sparing Biden the hysteria now aimed at Trump.

Under Trump, every tariff or market blip is apocalyptic; under Biden, crippling costs were rationalized as temporary setbacks. This double standard drives a wedge between data and sentiment.

Two Realities Collide

While MSM paints the economy as teetering, a parallel reality is emerging.

Disillusioned by the mainstream narrative—whether they’re contrarians, investors, or everyday citizens—many are tuning out the noise and seeing opportunity. Main Street investors are eyeing undervalued stocks, betting on Trump’s pro-industry policies to spark growth. Small business owners sense a manufacturing revival, especially in the Midwest. Online communities on platforms like X hum with optimism about tariffs reshaping trade in America’s favor.

For these folks, the economic climate isn’t a crisis—it’s a chance to innovate, invest, and reclaim agency. This split creates a surreal dynamic: one group dreads a media-fueled collapse, while another thrives on rejecting it, as if two economies coexist in the same data.

Why the Sudden Alarmism?

MSM’s gloom isn’t just clickbait—it’s strategic, especially for Democratic-leaning factions shaping narratives despite losing the White House in 2024. FUD serves multiple ends:

Policy Leverage: Economic fear leads voters to embrace bold Democratic reforms—like universal basic income or wealth taxes—as fixes for a "broken" system.

Voter Mobilization: Anxiety drives turnout, rallying support for change-driven candidates.

Party Power Shifts: Progressives use unease to push moderates toward radical policies.

Scapegoating: Blaming “greedflation” or corporations deflects from past policy flops, justifying regulation.

Eroding Self-Reliance: Some argue that Democrats nudge society toward dependence on a bloated government by framing markets as chaotic, sidelining individual initiative.

Cultural Reshaping: Relentless market-bashing erodes faith in capitalism, tilting support toward state intervention.

There’s a speculative kicker: bearish sentiment can soften markets, letting savvy investors buy low. Intentional or not, the result is a public primed for panic—but only under certain presidents.

Trump’s Plan: Big Bets, Bigger Noise

Trump’s second term, launched in 2025, doubles down on nationalism: tariffs, deregulation, and pro-industry policies. His moves include:

Tariff Expansion: Higher duties, especially on Chinese goods, boost U.S. manufacturing and reduce foreign reliance.

Deregulation: Slashing energy, finance, and labor rules to fuel growth.

Tax Breaks: Plans to reward firms bringing jobs and capital stateside.

Fed Pressure: Complaining about high interest rates and urging for looser policies to spur expansion and lower interest rates.

Early signs? Equity markets wobble upward, manufacturing sentiment rises (especially in the Midwest), and Treasury yields hint at cautious confidence. Optimists predict job growth, wage gains, and a stronger U.S. versus China.

Risks linger: tariffs could spike consumer prices, trade partners might retaliate, and mainstream media’s panic headlines keep markets jittery—headlines that were far quieter when we faced worse challenges under Biden.

The Cost of a Lopsided Narrative

Real issues—housing costs, student debt, wage stagnation—hurt plenty. But when MSM fixates on them, ignoring progress, nuance dies. A strong economy with flaws isn’t doomed, yet the media blurs the line.

Under Biden, soaring inflation and gas prices were “manageable”; under Trump, minor hiccups are cataclysmic. The inconsistency glares.

This selective outrage bites back. Doom-laden framing tanks consumer confidence, slowing spending and investment and risking the slowdowns it predicts. Worse, it breeds cynicism. When headlines clash with data—or shrug at one administration’s chaos but freak out at another’s—trust in media and institutions crumbles.

When Success Is Suspect

It's becoming increasingly clear that for many in the establishment—whether political, media, or institutional—the only acceptable narrative is one in which everyone is struggling. When the economy shows resilience, the tone shifts to cynical skepticism.

• When markets rebound, it's "suspicious."

• When businesses thrive, it's "corporate greed."

• When policies work, it must be a "mirage."

If everyone is failing, the system retains control. Managed expectations, fear-based loyalty, and dependency become the norm. In that world, optimism is seen as naive, and individual success is painted as selfish or unethical.

Progress becomes suspect. Pain becomes proof. And prosperity becomes something to be questioned rather than celebrated.

This environment fosters a cultural mindset that resists growth and embraces managed decline. It shifts people from ownership to dependence, from entrepreneurship to compliance, and from agency to apathy.

In a discussion on Real Time with Bill Maher, journalist Bari Weiss emphasized the importance of resisting the pervasive negativity in public discourse. She stated, “We don’t need to race to the bottom,” highlighting the need to avoid a cultural mindset that normalizes failure and pessimism. Weiss advocated for a narrative that celebrates resilience and optimism, countering the trend of embracing decline as the default perspective.

Time to Pick Your Reality

Perception now rivals reality. The mainstream media’s fear-fest during Trump's presidency, after downplaying Biden’s crises, is not only inconsistent—it’s manipulative.

Meanwhile, those who reject the script see a different world of possibilities. Trump’s economic initiatives depend on American industry, but they face challenges—not least from a media that declares that the sky is falling.

As consumers, investors, and citizens, we must ask: Are we responding to the economy or a narrative that cherry-picks its crises? The real danger isn’t tariffs or inflation—it’s allowing someone else’s story to define our reality: boom or bust.

Whichever reality you live in—make sure it’s yours, not someone else's projection.

As always, I look forward to your comments below.

---

“If you enjoyed this post, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe!”